<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supplier Onboarding Costs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stephensnexus.com/2006/05/02/65/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stephensnexus.com/2006/05/02/65/</link>
	<description>Dave Stephens on technology and business trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:20:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Brooks</title>
		<link>http://stephensnexus.com/2006/05/02/65/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Brooks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 03:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://procurement.wordpress.com/2006/05/02/65/#comment-61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave, nice analysis. I&#039;ve consistenly enjoyed your posts, so keep up the great work.

As far as supplier onboarding costs go, I think this is one of those areas where you&#039;re faced on one hand with a &quot;boiling the ocean&quot; problem -- how to realistically onboard tens of thousands of suppliers, particularly if you don&#039;t have a reliable supplier data across your enterprise -- and on the other with picking the most important supplier relationships to enable first. 

A network would seem like a convenient solution, but it is sort of a least common denominator approach when applied across ALL suppliers a la EDI/VAN. The surviving marketplaces take a different approach, but siloed by industry. And with all the hullabaloo about outsourcing, what do you do about outsourced relationships? How far down the multi-tier food chain do you go?

I agree that most organizations don&#039;t give enough attention to supplier onboarding costs -- or any kind of supplier operational investment -- until they&#039;re already locked in with an approach/vendor and alternatives are impractical. It will be interesting to see how this problem gets solved as procurement evolves.

K]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, nice analysis. I&#8217;ve consistenly enjoyed your posts, so keep up the great work.</p>
<p>As far as supplier onboarding costs go, I think this is one of those areas where you&#8217;re faced on one hand with a &#8220;boiling the ocean&#8221; problem &#8212; how to realistically onboard tens of thousands of suppliers, particularly if you don&#8217;t have a reliable supplier data across your enterprise &#8212; and on the other with picking the most important supplier relationships to enable first. </p>
<p>A network would seem like a convenient solution, but it is sort of a least common denominator approach when applied across ALL suppliers a la EDI/VAN. The surviving marketplaces take a different approach, but siloed by industry. And with all the hullabaloo about outsourcing, what do you do about outsourced relationships? How far down the multi-tier food chain do you go?</p>
<p>I agree that most organizations don&#8217;t give enough attention to supplier onboarding costs &#8212; or any kind of supplier operational investment &#8212; until they&#8217;re already locked in with an approach/vendor and alternatives are impractical. It will be interesting to see how this problem gets solved as procurement evolves.</p>
<p>K</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

